Journal article
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 155(S3), Ottawa, ON, 2024 May, pp. A270
APA
Click to copy
Arzbecker, L. J., & Jacewicz, E. (2024). Quantitative assessment of English accent variation: Levenshtein distance and perceptual identification. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 155(S3), A270.
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Arzbecker, Lian J., and Ewa Jacewicz. “Quantitative Assessment of English Accent Variation: Levenshtein Distance and Perceptual Identification.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 155, no. S3 (May 2024): A270.
MLA
Click to copy
Arzbecker, Lian J., and Ewa Jacewicz. “Quantitative Assessment of English Accent Variation: Levenshtein Distance and Perceptual Identification.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 155, no. S3, May 2024, p. A270.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{lian2024a,
title = {Quantitative assessment of English accent variation: Levenshtein distance and perceptual identification},
year = {2024},
month = may,
address = {Ottawa, ON},
issue = {S3},
journal = {The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America},
pages = {A270},
volume = {155},
author = {Arzbecker, Lian J. and Jacewicz, Ewa},
month_numeric = {5}
}
This is a perceptual study with a basis in acoustic phonetics. It investigates the extent to which accents of English can be quantified by the Levenshtein distance (LD), a string metric. LD defines string similarity by the minimum number of character edits required to transform one string into another. Narrowly transcribed speech samples of English provide the phonetic strings required for LD comparison. For the purposes of the current experiment, 24 speakers representing four English accent varieties are included: Midland American (control), British/Australian, Hindi-influenced, and Mandarin-influenced. High- and low-pass filters are used to augment or attenuate perceptual contribution of high- versus low-frequency information in the speech signal. Predictions stem from published correlations between LD and listeners’ perceptional ratings of intelligibility and native-likeness. For a group of monolingual American English listeners, confusion is expected between Midland American and British/Australian accents due to similarly low LDs, further intensified by low-pass filtering. However, fewer confusions are predicted between Hindi- and Mandarin-influenced English, due to varying L1 influences and the absence/presence of tonal information. This research seeks to explore accent perception, investigating the relationship between manipulated aspects of the speech signal and listener identification.